Transient nicotine exposure in early adolescent male mice freezes their dopamine circuits in an immature state
Reynolds L. Gulmez A. Fayad S. Campos R. Rigoni D. Nguyen C. Le Borgne T. Topilko T. Rajot D. Franco C. Fernandez S. Marti F. Heck N. Mourot A. Renier N. Barik J. Faure P (2024). Transient nicotine exposure in early adolescent male mice freezes their dopamine circuits in an immature state. Nature Communications, 15(1), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53327-w
- Overall rating
-
(4.0) 1 review
- Authors
- Lauren M. Reynolds, Aylin Gulmez, Sophie L. Fayad, Renan Costa Campos, Daiana Rigoni, Claire Nguyen, Tinaïg Le Borgne, Thomas Topilko, Domitille Rajot, Clara Franco, Sebastian P. Fernandez, Fabio Marti, Nicolas Heck, Alexandre Mourot, Nicolas Renier, Jacques Barik, Philippe Faure
- Journal
- Nature Communications
- First published
- 2024
- Number of citations
- 5
- Type
- Journal Article
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-53327-w
Abstract
AbstractHow nicotine acts on developing neurocircuitry in adolescence to promote later addiction vulnerability remains largely unknown, but may hold the key for informing more effective intervention efforts. We found transient nicotine exposure in early adolescent (PND 21-28) male mice was sufficient to produce a marked vulnerability to nicotine in adulthood (PND 60 + ), associated with disrupted functional connectivity in dopaminergic circuits. These mice showed persistent adolescent-like behavioral and physiological responses to nicotine, suggesting that nicotine exposure in adolescence prolongs an immature, imbalanced state in the function of these circuits. Chemogenetically resetting the balance between the underlying dopamine circuits unmasked the mature behavioral response to acute nicotine in adolescent-exposed mice. Together, our results suggest that the perseverance of a developmental imbalance between dopamine pathways may alter vulnerability profiles for later dopamine-dependent psychopathologies.
Reviews
Informative Title
Methods
Statistical Analysis
Data Presentation
Discussion
Limitations
Data Available
Exposing mice to nicotine during early adolescence primes their VTA-NAc dopaminergic circuit to be more sensitive even in adulthood, blunting the anxiogenic response of nicotine and potentially leading to nicotine addiction. This can be reversed with causal pathway manipulation (e.g., using chemogenetics). Why did they decide to use chemogenetics and not optogenetics? I also did not understand the whole-brain mapping experiments. I liked the discussion section, specifically the wider impact but there was not too much discussion of limitations of their own experiment.