Seasonal oscillation of liver-derived hibernation protein complex in the central nervous system of non-hibernating mammals

Seldin M. Byerly M. Petersen P. Swanson R. Balkema-Buschmann A. Groschup M. Wong G (2014). Seasonal oscillation of liver-derived hibernation protein complex in the central nervous system of non-hibernating mammals. Journal of Experimental Biology, 217(15), 2667-2679. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.095976

Overall rating
(4.0) 1 review
Authors
Marcus M. Seldin, Mardi S. Byerly, Pia S. Petersen, Roy Swanson, Anne Balkema-Buschmann, Martin H. Groschup, G. William Wong
Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
First published
2014
Number of citations
12
Type
Journal Article
DOI
10.1242/jeb.095976

Abstract

Mammalian hibernation elicits profound changes in whole-body physiology. The liver-derived hibernation protein (HP) complex, consisting of HP-20, HP-25 and HP-27, was shown to oscillate circannually, and this oscillation in the central nervous system (CNS) was suggested to play a role in hibernation. The HP complex has been found in hibernating chipmunks but not in related non-hibernating tree squirrels, leading to the suggestion that hibernation-specific genes may underlie the origin of hibernation. Here, we show that non-hibernating mammals express and regulate the conserved homologous HP complex in a seasonal manner, independent of hibernation. Comparative analyses of cow and chipmunk HPs revealed extensive biochemical and structural conservations. These include liver-specific expression, assembly of distinct heteromeric complexes that circulate in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid, and the striking seasonal oscillation of the HP levels in the blood and CNS. Central administration of recombinant HPs affected food intake in mice, without altering body temperature, physical activity levels or energy expenditure. Our results demonstrate that HP complex is not unique to the hibernators and suggest that the HP-regulated liver–brain circuit may couple seasonal changes in the environment to alterations in physiology.

Reviews

Informative Title

100%
Appropriate
Slightly Misleading
Exaggerated

Methods

100%
Sound
Questionable
Inadequate

Statistical Analysis

100%
Appropriate
Some Issues
Major concerns

Data Presentation

100%
Complete and Transparent
Minor Omissions
Misrepresented

Discussion

100%
Appropriate
Slightly Misleading
Exaggerated

Limitations

100%
Appropriately acknowledged
Minor Omissions
Inadequate

Data Available

100%
Completely Available
Partial data available
Not Open Access

Sign in to add a review. Help the research community by sharing your assessment of this journal-article.

PurpleScalpel Aug 18, 2025

Overall a interesting paper - interesting methods, though some points to note: what determined the n of mice to use? I did not see a power analysis, and n=6 seems rather arbitrary.