1 Review

really enjoyed this paper. open source data and preregistered study. good explanation throughout of choices. “identified as women” and good breakdown of “genders” in the table. good note re indigenous participants. clear explanation of findings and potential disparities (e.g. not summing up 100%). clear ethics statement. why not include non-binary demographics in study 2? good descriptive statistics, easy to follow analysis intro and discussion well written - would be easy for non-academic to follow limitations the authors touched on as well - top 100 videos may not represent actual experience of individual users