Mitochondria Clumping vs. Mitochondria Fusion in CMT2A Diseases

Franco A. Walton C. Dang X (2022). Mitochondria Clumping vs. Mitochondria Fusion in CMT2A Diseases. Life, 12(12), 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122110

Overall rating
(5.0) 1 review
Authors
Antonietta Franco, Caroline E. Walton, Xiawei Dang
Journal
Life
First published
2022
Number of citations
8
Type
Journal Article
DOI
10.3390/life12122110

Abstract

Phenotypic variations in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A (CMT2A) result from the many mutations in the mitochondrial fusion protein, mitofusin 2 (MFN2). While the GTPase domain mutations of MFN2 lack the ability to hydrolyze GTP and complete mitochondrial fusion, the mechanism of dysfunction in HR1 domain mutations has yet to be explored. Using Mfn1/Mfn2 double null cells and Mfn2 knock out (KO) fibroblasts, we measured the ability of this variant protein to change conformations and hydrolyze GTP. We found that a mutation in the HR1 domain (M376A) of MFN2 results in conformational change dysfunction while maintaining GTPase ability. Prolonged exposure to mitofusin agonist MiM 111 reverses mitochondrial fusion dysfunction in the HR1 mutant through encouraging an open conformation, resulting in a potential therapeutic model in this variant. Herein, we describe a novel mechanism of dysfunction in MFN2 variants through exploring domain-specific mitochondrial characteristics leading to CMT2A.

Reviews

Informative Title

100%
Appropriate
Slightly Misleading
Exaggerated

Methods

100%
Sound
Questionable
Inadequate

Statistical Analysis

100%
Appropriate
Some Issues
Major concerns

Data Presentation

100%
Complete and Transparent
Minor Omissions
Misrepresented

Discussion

100%
Appropriate
Slightly Misleading
Exaggerated

Limitations

100%
Appropriately acknowledged
Minor Omissions
Inadequate

Data Available

100%
Completely Available
Partial data available
Not Open Access

Sign in to add a review. Help the research community by sharing your assessment of this journal-article.

TanFlask Sep 21, 2025

This is a thorough paper, well constructed and carried out. Sound reasoning that is justified, and large number of methods used to explore mitochondrial phenotypes here. Paper is free to access although I could not find raw data. My one question of the statistics carried out is why only ANOVAs were carried out. I would question whether other statistical tests could have been more appropriate.