Community-driven scientific paper ratings. Evaluate quality, not just citations.

Community-driven scientific paper ratings. Evaluate quality, not just citations.

Recently reviewed papers

Browse all papers

Automated novelty evaluation of academic paper: A collaborative approach integrating human and large language model knowledge

Wenqing Wu, Chengzhi Zhang, Yi Zhao

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology2025
4.0/5
1 reviews

Evaluating the Reporting Quality of 21,041 Randomized Controlled Trial Articles with Large Language Models: A Large-Scale Transparency Analysis

Apoorva Srinivasan, Sophia Kivelson, Nadine A. Friedrich,...

Lecture Notes in Computer Science2025
4.0/5
1 reviews

Cats learn the names of their friend cats in their daily lives

Saho Takagi, Atsuko Saito, Minori Arahori, Hitomi Chijiiw...

Scientific Reports2022
4.0/5
1 reviews

Anonymous protected reviews

Review papers honestly without career risk

Quality over citations

Discover research based on scientific merit rather than citation counts.

Enhance scientific transparency

Help build a research ecosystem where quality and reproducibility take priority.

Verified Academic Community

Connect with researchers for meaningful discourse

Latest Blogposts

See more

Frequently asked questions

What is Paperstars?

Paperstars is a platform where researchers can rate and review published scientific papers. Think Goodreads, but for science — with a focus on quality, transparency, and open dialogue.

How does academic verification work?

Reviewers who are academically verified (via academic email) have a "verified academic" badge. This ensures credibility while keeping reviews anonymous, so everyone can speak freely.

Why should I verify my academic status?

Verification adds credibility to your reviews while maintaining your anonymity. It helps build trust in the platform by ensuring reviews come from actual researchers in the field.

Are my reviews anonymous?

Yes — all reviews are anonymous by default, but your academic status is verified. This lets researchers give honest, critical feedback without fear of professional repercussions.

When you interact with a paper, you will be randomly assigned a pseudonym, e.g. "PurpleMicroscope". This is your anonymous name for this paper only.