Cookies on Paperstars

We use Google Analytics to understand how people use Paperstars and improve the site. Are you okay with that?

YMrCA: Improving Y‐chromosomal ancestor time estimation for DNA kinship research

Claerhout S. Vanpaemel S. Gill M. Antiga L. Baele G. Decorte R (2021). YMrCA: Improving Y‐chromosomal ancestor time estimation for DNA kinship research. Human Mutation, 42(10), 1307-1320. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.24259

Overall rating
(3.0) 1 review
Authors
Sofie Claerhout, Simon Vanpaemel, Mandev S. Gill, Laura G. Antiga, Guy Baele, Ronny Decorte
Journal
Human Mutation
First published
2021
Number of citations
6
Type
Journal Article

Embed Review

Share a live Paperstars badge for YMrCA: Improving Y‐chromosomal ancestor time estimation for DNA kinship research. Copy the HTML below and paste it into your site.

Paperstars badge preview

Reviews

Informative Title

100%
Appropriate
Slightly Misleading
Exaggerated

Methods

100%
Sound
Questionable
Inadequate

Statistical Analysis

100%
Appropriate
Some Issues
Major concerns

Data Presentation

100%
Complete and Transparent
Minor Omissions
Misrepresented

Discussion

100%
Appropriate
Slightly Misleading
Exaggerated

Limitations

100%
Appropriately acknowledged
Minor Omissions
Inadequate

Data Available

100%
Completely Available
Partial data available
Not Open Access

Sign in to add a review. Help the research community by sharing your assessment of this journal-article.

RaspberryJoint Sep 09, 2026

The use of "generations" for portions of the text in the discussion are not informative. The Confidence intervals that were used in the paper will always miss the mode of the distribution, if the mode is the first or last generation that was calculated. Additionally, visualization of the predictions is continuous, but the predictions are suggested to be discrete (=distance in meioses). The discussion on what to do when a prediction has their mode on 40 meioses, or whether 40 meioses is sufficient to predict for genealogical distances is not mentioned, for the first, it should omit the prediction as it is not confirmed to be complete.