Community-driven scientific paper ratings. Evaluate quality, not just citations.

Community-driven scientific paper ratings. Evaluate quality, not just citations.

Recently reviewed papers

Browse all papers

Attenuated Tonic and Enhanced Phasic Release of Dopamine in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Rajendra D. Badgaiyan, Sampada Sinha, Munawwar Sajjad, Da...

PLOS ONE2015
3.0/5
1 reviews

Distinct symptom recoveries based upon highest level of care in patients with sport-related concussion or traumatic brain injury and Glasgow Coma Scale 13–15

Shawn R. Eagle, Bryan Lamb, Daniel Huber, Michael A. McCr...

Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery2025
4.0/5
1 reviews

Seasonal fluctuations in BDNF regulate hibernation and torpor in golden-mantled ground squirrels

Caterina M. Hernandez, Gregory L. Florant, Alexis M. Stra...

American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology2024
4.0/5
1 reviews

Anonymous protected reviews

Review papers honestly without career risk

Quality over citations

Discover research based on scientific merit rather than citation counts.

Enhance scientific transparency

Help build a research ecosystem where quality and reproducibility take priority.

Verified Academic Community

Connect with researchers for meaningful discourse

Latest Blogposts

See more

Frequently asked questions

What is Paperstars?

Paperstars is a platform where researchers can rate and review published scientific papers. Think Goodreads, but for science — with a focus on quality, transparency, and open dialogue.

How does academic verification work?

Reviewers who are academically verified (via academic email) have a "verified academic" badge. This ensures credibility while keeping reviews anonymous, so everyone can speak freely.

Why should I verify my academic status?

Verification adds credibility to your reviews while maintaining your anonymity. It helps build trust in the platform by ensuring reviews come from actual researchers in the field.

Are my reviews anonymous?

Yes — all reviews are anonymous by default, but your academic status is verified. This lets researchers give honest, critical feedback without fear of professional repercussions.

When you interact with a paper, you will be randomly assigned a pseudonym, e.g. "PurpleMicroscope". This is your anonymous name for this paper only.